@article{Mannheim1994,

title = {The Language of the Inka Since the European Invasion . Bruce Mannheim},

author = {Bruce Mannheim and Jane H. Hill},

doi = {10.1525/ae.1994.21.4.02a01980},

year  = {1994},

date = {1994-11-01},

urldate = {1994-11-01},

journal = {American Ethnologist},

volume = {21},

number = {4},

pages = {1084-1085},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1992,

title = {The Inka language in the colonial world},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

doi = {10.1080/10609169208569790},

year  = {1992},

date = {1992-01-01},

urldate = {1992-01-01},

journal = {Colonial Latin American Review},

volume = {1},

number = {1-2},

pages = {77-108},

abstract = {The year 1492 is remembered not only for the fall of Moslem Granada, for the expulsion of the Spanish Jews, and for Columbus's first voyage, but for the first vernacular grammar, by one Antonio de Nebrija. Although the juxtaposition of the first three events with the publication of Nebrija's grammar may appear to trivialize them, they were in fact closely related. All four were part of the same imperial project, the fashioning of the first recognizably modern nation-state, formulated in terms of shared cultural practices, including a shared language and a shared religion, over a contiguous topography. Although Nebrija was not the first to suggest that linguistic unification was the companion of political unification (Asensio 1960), his assertion had special appeal in the context of Spanish state-making.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1991,

title = {Entrevista a Bruce Mannheim: La normalización de las lenguas nativas},

author = {Bruce Mannheim and Juan de Dios Yapita},

year  = {1991},

date = {1991-10-20},

urldate = {1991-10-20},

journal = {Presencia},

volume = {4},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1991d,

title = {After Dreaming: Image and Interpretation in Southern Peruvian Quechua},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

year  = {1991},

date = {1991-01-01},

urldate = {1991-01-01},

journal = {Etnofoor},

volume = {4},

number = {2},

pages = {43-79},

abstract = {Before the European invasion of Peru and since, in everyday life and in times of crisis, Andean people have gauged their prospects by their dreams. According to the Quechua drama Atau Uallpac Ppuchucacuininpa Uancan,'The wanica of Ataw Wallpa's end [or downfall]'the last Inka, Ataw Wallpa woke from his sleep, tormented by his dreams of two nights in succession: 1 musccuiniipiri ricuni Ynti maillic taitanchicta yana ccusnipi pacasccata llapa hanac pachataca llapa urccucunatauanri puca puca raurascaccta pillcucunac ccascuntahina And in my dream I saw the Sun, our cleansing father hidden by dark smoke and all the heavens and all the mountains burning red, as red as the chests of a flock of birds.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1990,

title = {La chronología relativa de la lengua y la literatura quechua cuzqueña},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

year  = {1990},

date = {1990-01-01},

urldate = {1990-01-01},

journal = {Revista andina},

volume = {8},

number = {15},

pages = {139-177},

abstract = {La cronología relativa de la lengua y literatura quechua cusqueña | Revista Andina Salto rápido al contenido de la página Navegación principal Contenido principal Barra lateral Registrarse Entrar Revista Andina Actual Archivos Normas editoriales Acerca de Sobre la revista Envíos Equipo editorial Declaración de privacidad Contacto Buscar 1.Inicio 2.Archivos 3.Núm. (1990): Revista Andina 15 4.Artículos, Notas y Documentos La cronología relativa de la lengua y literatura quechua cusqueña Barra lateral del artículo PDF Contenido principal del artículo Bruce Mannheim Resumen La cronología relativa de la lengua y literatura quechua cusqueña Detalles del artículo Cómo citar MannheimB. (1). La cronología relativa de la lengua y literatura quechua cusqueña. Revista Andina, (15), 139-177. Recuperado a partir de http://revista.cbc.org.pe/index.php/revista-andina/article/view/179 Número Núm.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1989,

title = {La memoria y el olvido en la política lingüística colonial},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

year  = {1989},

date = {1989-04-10},

urldate = {1989-04-10},

journal = {Lexis (Peru)},

volume = {13},

number = {1},

pages = {13-45},

abstract = {Milan Kundera Desde la invasión europea, como lo señalara Albó (1973), el quechua l. Una versión de este artículo, que ha sido revisado para la presente publicación, apareció en inglés bajo el título de" Una nación acorralada" en la revista Language and Socii! ty en 1984. Agradezco a Robbins Burling, Roswith Hartmann, Shirley Brice Heath, Diane E. Hopkins, Richard LaPrade, Ricardo Otheguy, Susan U. Philips, y Nessa Wolfson por su valiosa crítica. Agradezco también a Mercedes Niño-Murcia ya Deborah A. Poole por señalarme la necesidad de una versión castellana ya Isabel Bustarnante por la gentileza de traducir este artículo. Asumo la responsabilidad por cualquier error de datos o interpretación que aparezca en este trabajo. Este trabajo fue en parte financiado por la Fundación Wenner-Gren para la Investigación Antropológica.

Asimismo, una versión anterior al artículo fue leída en el Décimo Simposio del Programa Interamericano de Lingüística y Enseñanza de Idiomas celebrado en julio de 1981. En este trabajo se pretende demostrar la complejidad de la situación lingüística colonial y la clausura del discurso colonial sobre la cuestión lingüística.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1988,

title = {On the Sibilants of Colonial Southern Peruvian Quechua},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

doi = {10.1086/466081},

year  = {1988},

date = {1988-08-04},

urldate = {1988-08-04},

journal = {International Journal of American Linguistics},

volume = {54},

number = {2},

pages = {168-208},

abstract = {Introduction. Philological evidence and comparative reconstruction illuminate one another, in that comparative reconstruction establishes a context within which philological evidence can be evaluated. In turn, philological evidence permits a more fine-grained interpretation of the diachronic processes of change. Philological evidence may provide independent confirmation of reconstructed forms and innovations; but it also can reveal unexpected connections between diachronic innovations, or unexpected paths which they followed. These allow us to refine reconstructions or to generate new diachronic hypotheses. When it is available, written evidence embeds a linguistic reconstruction in concrete history-in the spread of linguistic innovations, in textual traditions, and in the scribe's particular political and social circumstances.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1988b,

title = {The sound must seem an echo to the sense: Some cultural determinants of language change in Southern Peruvian Quechua},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

year  = {1988},

date = {1988-01-01},

urldate = {1988-01-01},

journal = {Michigan Discussions in Anthropology},

volume = {8},

pages = {175 - 191},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1987,

title = {Couplets and oblique contexts: The social organization of a folksong},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

doi = {10.1515/text.1.1987.7.3.265},

year  = {1987},

date = {1987-01-01},

urldate = {1987-01-01},

journal = {Text-Interdisciplinary journal for the study of discourse},

volume = {7},

number = {3},

pages = {265-288},

abstract = {Text & Talk (founded as TEXT in 1981) is an internationally recognized forum for interdisciplinary research in language, discourse, and communication studies, focusing, among other things, on the situational and historical nature of text/talk production; the cognitive and sociocultural processes of language practice/action; and participant-based structures of meaning negotiation and multimodal alignment. Text & Talk encourages critical debates on these and other relevant issues, spanning not only the theoretical and methodological dimensions of discourse but also their practical and socially relevant outcomes.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1986,

title = {Comentario a Willem Adelaar, ‘La relación quechua-aru’},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

year  = {1986},

date = {1986-01-01},

urldate = {1986-01-01},

journal = {Revista Andina},

pages = {413 - 418},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1986b,

title = {Poetic form in Guaman Poma’s Wariqsa Arawi},

author = {Bruce Mannheim and R. Tom Zuidema},

year  = {1986},

date = {1986-01-01},

urldate = {1986-01-01},

journal = {Amerindia},

volume = {11},

pages = {41-67},

abstract = {You are in the main square of Cuzco, the Inka capital, several years before the European invasion, on a day late in April-Inka raymi killa, the month of the festival of the Inka (GUAMAN POMA, 1615: 319 and 243), as the Inka and his royal entourage celebrate their victory over the year's harvest and commemorate the ending of the rains 2. The earth has died until the new agricultural year, the crop stored. It is a time for drying aquatic plants-morqoto and llullucha-for food. As in the antipodal rite in October, there is a llama-in this instance a white one draped in red (or reddish-brown)-tied to a gnomon on the square. The llama is fed with aha, maize beer, and thanked for the harvest. It sings the sound of the rivers, and the Inka sings with it (figure one). Here is what the early seventeenth-century ethnographer Felipe GUAMAN POMA DE AYALA reconstructed from the memories of his elderly informants.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1986c,

title = {Popular song and popular grammar, poetry and metalanguage},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

doi = {10.1080/00437956.1986.11435766},

year  = {1986},

date = {1986-01-01},

urldate = {1986-01-01},

journal = {Word},

volume = {37},

number = {1-2},

pages = {45-75},

abstract = { Two figures stand out in the turn-of-the-century reformulations of grammatical theory which gave birth to modern linguistics, Ferdinand de Saussure and Franz Boas. Each rejected the categorial platonism oftraditional rational grammar, that is, the idea that grammatical categories had a universal, non-cultural, non-historical logic which transcended their expression in particular languages.~ Each argued for what we might call a" relational perspectivalist" view of grammatical categories. By" relational perspectivalist" I mean that grammatical meaning can only be understood in terms of the grammatical systems of which the categories are part (Boas 1911: 43, 1938: 132f.; Saussure 1915: 16lff.). The Saussurian doctrine of·'the arbitrariness of the sign''(paralleled by Boas 1911: 25-7)-however flawed it may appear today (Benveniste 1939).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1986d,

title = {The language of reciprocity in Southern Peruvian Quechua},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

year  = {1986},

date = {1986-01-01},

urldate = {1986-01-01},

journal = {Anthropological Linguistics},

volume = {28},

number = {3},

pages = {267-273},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1986e,

title = {Poetic form in Guaman Poma's Wariqsa Arawi},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

year  = {1986},

date = {1986-01-01},

urldate = {1986-01-01},

journal = {Amerindia},

volume = {11},

pages = {41-67},

abstract = {You are in the main square of Cuzco, the Inka capital, several years before the European invasion, on a day late in April-Inka raymi killa, the month of the festival of the Inka (GUAMAN POMA, 1615: 319 and 243), as the Inka and his royal entourage celebrate their victory over the year's harvest and commemorate the ending of the rains 2. The earth has died until the new agricultural year, the crop stored. It is a time for drying aquatic plants-morqoto and llullucha-for food. As in the antipodal rite in October, there is a llama-in this instance a white one draped in red (or reddish-brown)-tied to a gnomon on the square. The llama is fed with aha, maize beer, and thanked for the harvest. It sings the sound of the rivers, and the Inka sings with it (figure one). Here is what the early seventeenth-century ethnographer Felipe GUAMAN POMA DE AYALA reconstructed from the memories of his elderly informants.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1984,

title = {Una Nación Acorralada: Southern Peruvian Quechua Language Planning and Politics in Historical Perspective},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

doi = {10.1017/S0047404500010514},

year  = {1984},

date = {1984-01-01},

urldate = {1984-01-01},

journal = {Language in Society},

volume = {13},

number = {03},

pages = {291 - 309},

abstract = {This paper sketches Spanish colonial policies toward Southern Peruvian Quechua in order to identify long-term trends and constants. I emphasize the following conjunctures in the debate on the status of the indigenous languages: (1) the simultaneous efforts to restrict the inroads of bilingualism in the legal and political domain and to encourage bilingualism among local headmen so as to facilitate indirect rule in the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries; (2) the debate as to the role of the vernacular in religious education and missionary work in the same period, a debate in which the position favoring use of the vernacular held out for a time against calls for forced liquidation of the indigenous languages; (3) the ascendancy of the position calling for liquidation in the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries; and (4) the role of Southern Peruvian Quechua as a nationalist emblem during the eighteenth century. These conjunctures have considerable relevance today. Differences in vocabulary and ideological justification have obscured the continuity between colonial and modern language policy. The issues debated, the limits of the alternatives proposed as solutions, and even the practical efforts carried out on behalf of alternative policies, have been surprisingly perdurable. For four and a half centuries the “Andean language debate,” the issues and terms of language policy, have continued to have at their center the question of whether or not the Quechua have a right to exist as a separate community. (Language policy, colonialism, South America, Quechua).},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1982b,

title = {Person, number and inclusivity in two andean languages},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

doi = {10.1080/03740463.1982.10416044},

year  = {1982},

date = {1982-07-01},

urldate = {1982-07-01},

journal = {Acta Linguistica Hafniensia},

volume = {17},

number = {2},

pages = {139-156},

abstract = {The problem I wish to address here is first of all historiographie and that is the ultimate textual provenience of the analytic categories ‘inclusive’ and ‘exclusive’ as applied to person systems. A distinction between inclusive, a sort of ‘we’ including the addressee, and exclusive, a ‘we’ excluding the addressee, is linguistically quite common, as Forchheimer's (1953) survey and William Jacobsen's areal study of western North America (1980) demonstrate. It is of interest to the South Americanist because, according to Mary Haas’ well known historiographie study (1969), amplified by Martha Hardman-de-Bautista (1972), the terms first appeared in colonial grammatical studies of both Aymara and Southern Peruvian Quechua. But it is also of interest to the Indo-Europeanist because of the possibility that like categories may be reconstructable for Indo-European (Kurylowicz, 1964:149), and consideration of the historiography of the terms leads to greater analytic precision with respect to their nature.},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}

@article{Mannheim1982,

title = {A Note on 'Inclusive/Exclusive' in Sixteenth-Century Peru},

author = {Bruce Mannheim},

doi = {10.1086/465754},

year  = {1982},

date = {1982-01-01},

urldate = {1982-01-01},

journal = {International Journal of American Linguistics},

volume = { 48},

number = {4},

keywords = {},

pubstate = {published},

tppubtype = {article}

}